To Dance Or Not To Dance?

Is Cha-Cha a vital key towards economic, or let’s say – over-all progression of our country?

Or is it just to retain and extend the term of her Presidency?

~ by utakgago on December 6, 2006.

Posted in Opinion

18 Responses to “To Dance Or Not To Dance?”

  1. just one thing: i am not against Her Excellency Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo.

    PAURONG said this on December 6, 2006 at 3:17 pm

  2. i guess you’re right. she wants to stay longer in malacanang. :P

    denib said this on December 6, 2006 at 4:20 pm

  3. Both. But the first one seems to be impossible if her incumbency is prolonged.

    Just kill her na lang and feast on the fatty acids of her husband Mr. Piggy in St. Lukes.

    Neil said this on December 6, 2006 at 6:23 pm

  4. Another thing: Paurong, you’re not really against her? My God, you poor creature. Get a good grip on our current stratosphere. I thought… nah, you’ve just disappointed me. Go on, sue me.

    Lol, of course.

    Neil said this on December 6, 2006 at 6:26 pm

  5. Hindi naman kailangan baguhin yung type ng government para umunlad. Madami pang paraan para umunlad yung Pilipinas eh. Bakit kailangan napaka-drastic ng babaguhin niya? XD So hot na hot ako. :D Dapat mag-focus na lang muna sa pagi-imlement ng laws kasi balewala din kung papalitan yung government pero ganun pa rin yung pamamalakad. :) )

    Pero kung hindi talaga maiwasan mag-chacha, pag-isipan muna nila mabuti. :>

    REDG. said this on December 6, 2006 at 6:31 pm

  6. Eeek. imlement? XD Implement yun. Sorry. :) )

    REDG. said this on December 6, 2006 at 6:32 pm

  7. matutuwa talaga ako kung makita kong matanggal ngipin niya dahil bumaon sa kinakain niyang mais. sus ko, dapat matagal na iyang napatalsik. saka iyang nunal niya, sana makagat ng daga dahil akala niya chocolate na may amag.

    GLORIA ARROYO
    YOU REALLY HAVE TO GO!
    GLORIA GLORIA
    BAGUSH! BAGUSH! BAGUSH!

    corny e…

    boy bawang said this on December 6, 2006 at 6:33 pm

  8. With regards to Reginne, I don’t think we can focus in law-making if the current legislators were too slow. And in fact, the process of law-making is becoming obsolete.

    Well, this drastic change of government really needs focus and concentration.

    utakGAGO said this on December 6, 2006 at 7:54 pm

  9. Boy Bawang, shallow reasons ha. Hihih. It’s not about her mole or her teeth, it’s about ruling this country.

    Oh well, that’s your opinion. And I do respect that. :)

    utakGAGO said this on December 6, 2006 at 7:59 pm

  10. wala akong masyadong kaalaman sa isyung panlipunan na tulad ng cha-cha. pero ika nga ng isang “math wizard” sa aming school, ang buhay ay parang Math, puros trial and error. lol.

    utewish said this on December 6, 2006 at 8:11 pm

  11. let’s see. i strongly believe that even if rotten apples would use a new and freshly knitted basket, the apples would still rot and smell bad.

    the Whore said this on December 6, 2006 at 9:33 pm

  12. kung hindi gumagana ang sistema ngayon, bakit hindi subukan ang iba? baka naman may pagbabago din itong maidulot. oo nga hahaba pa kasi ang termino niya pag ganun, pero matatapos at matatapos din yun.

    secret na lang kung anti or pro gloria ako, hindi naman yun ang punto ng cha cha (para sakin), kasi long term ang epekto ng usaping ito. aba, konstitusyon na ang usapan ay di lang ang ilang taong pagpapahaba ng pagkakaupo! haha!

    pero parang ayoko nung ipapalit. hmmm, di naman ako masyadong resistant sa pagbabago.. at kung iyon ang paraan at kinakailangan, sana lahat din ay bukas ang isipan. wala rin namang pumeperpekto sa unang hataw eh, kaya kung matuloy man ito, sigurado magiging medyo magulo sa umpisa..kaya..goodluck na lang sa Pilipinas! (both sarcastic at nonsarcastic)di pa ako makadecide kung sa itim o sa puti, i’m still at that 55%-45% stage.. hah, kailangan nang magdesisyon!

    paghent said this on December 7, 2006 at 12:12 am

  13. i’m freakishly against that cha-cha… if those rulers are really great leaders i will let them. unfortunately, they’re craps living in malacañang, senate and congress. if we will extend the terms of these craps, then the our country is near to be trashed!

    billycoy said this on December 7, 2006 at 10:57 am

  14. With Billycoy, I am supporting cha-cha but against extending the terms of those politicians. All we need is a new government – that’s a maybe.

    Hindi rin tayo sure.

    But if we’d subsist in this age-old government where cronyism and graft and corruption dominates – our country will be trashed forever.

    utakGAGO said this on December 7, 2006 at 12:15 pm

  15. now i no longer want cha-cha nor con-ass.

    PAURONG said this on December 7, 2006 at 2:44 pm

  16. I find it funny that people would go for or against cha-cha without doing an in-depth analysis on the topic. This thing abound in media write-ups and that infamous People’s Initiative, which clearly shows how the common people can be easily manipulated by fifty-cent rhetoric of bitching politicians. I believe there’s nothing wrong with our current system; the people holding the positions are problematic. Given that they were changed, the logical next question would be, What should happen next?

    And about the corruption shit, just want to share this thought. We are not poor because we are corrupt; we are corrupt because we are poor.

    Shoot that troll.

    Mikel said this on December 7, 2006 at 9:10 pm

  17. Chacha na kame..and you’re not even performing the Swing..hahaha..la lang..naalala ko lang..
    Well,I don’t love PGMA..but I also don’t hate her..
    I actually do not care..hehe..
    I just miss writing comments..

    SamSoon said this on December 8, 2006 at 7:51 pm

  18. Wengk.

    SamSoon’s comment is senseless.

    Well, as for Mikel. We should weigh both sides of a situation before judging it. At sabi mo nga, dapat alamin natin kung ano nga ba ang pros and cons ng isa’t isa.

    :d

    utakGAGO said this on December 8, 2006 at 8:53 pm

Leave a Reply